Federal
Warning on Faulty Furnaces Stokes Confusion
Saturday,
December 2, 2000
Home Edition/Section: Business/Page: C-1
Safety: In some cases,
utilities have shut down units that show no signs of failure
or pose no fire risk to homeowners, agency says.
By: JENNIFER OLDHAM TIMES STAFF
WRITER
A federal government alert on
unsafe residential furnaces this fall has created intense
confusion as homeowners and gas companies try to sort out
who is at risk.
The attic furnaces, manufactured
by Consolidated Industries, are alleged to have caused scores
of fires in California in the last decade.
"We've received hundreds of calls
from consumers who have had the gas company come out and red-tag
their furnace and turn off the gas," said Russ Radar, a spokesman
for the Consumer Product Safety Commission. "Some of the utilities
are doing this in an arbitrary fashion that doesn't necessarily
relate to the safety issues involved."
A red tag notifies homeowners
that a warning has been issued that their furnace is not safe.
The attic furnaces, sold under
at least 30 brand names and installed in homes in the state
from 1984 to 1992, fail and can catch fire because of alterations
made to comply with air-quality restrictions, according to
federal safety investigators. A class-action lawsuit filed
by California homeowners who have the faulty furnaces is scheduled
to go to trial next summer.
The CPSC issued a warning about
the furnaces this fall on the same day The Times published
the results of an investigation that found that hundreds of
thousands of unsuspecting California homeowners may have the
furnaces. The commission had known about the faulty furnaces
since the mid-1990s but failed to warn consumers.
The Times has received dozens
of calls and e-mails from homeowners from Pasadena to San
Diego who are trying to determine whether they have a faulty
Consolidated furnace. Many have turned for help to their local
gas company.
But in some cases, the gas companies
are shutting down Consolidated furnaces that aren't showing
signs of failure or that were installed outside the boundaries
of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District or the South
Coast Air Quality Management District, Radar said. Most of
the faulty furnaces are located in these areas--although Consolidated
furnaces also were sold as replacement furnaces.
(Gas company technicians relight
pilot lights on furnaces and make minor fixes but do not do
major repair work that involves taking the unit apart. A licensed
contractor must look at parts inside Consolidated furnaces
to determine whether there is damage.)
The CPSC recently sent a letter
to gas companies saying inspectors should red-tag only Consolidated
furnaces with an "X" at or near the end of the furnace's model
number. These furnaces have metal rods installed on the top
of the burner that increase the temperature in the furnace.
These rods, designed to decrease nitrogen oxide emitted by
the furnace, can cause the burner to warp and eventually allow
fire to escape, fire investigators say.
But federal safety investigators
say the new CPSC caveat may cause inspectors to miss units
whose model numbers were changed by Consolidated distributors
to reflect their brand names.
"The only problem with this theory
is that it works if the model numbers start with HAC or HCC,
but several distributors changed the model numbers," said
Gerald Zamiski, an engineer at Long Beach-based Vollmer-Gray
Engineering Laboratories who tested hundreds of Consolidated's
furnaces for a report commissioned by the CPSC.
For example, Trane, one of four
distributors named in the class-action lawsuit against Consolidated,
starts the model numbers on the Consolidated furnaces that
bear its brand name with the designation THN.
Addison Product Co., Bard Manufacturing,
American Standard/Trane Co. and Amana Home Appliances are
named in the class-action suit, which is scheduled to go to
trial July 2 in Santa Clara Superior Court. About 150,000
homeowners are included in the class.
Southern California Gas Co. red-tagged
about 1,400 Consolidated furnaces but now is sending letters
to residents outside the South Coast Air Quality Management
District offering to reinspect their furnaces, said Denise
King, a gas company spokeswoman.
San Diego Gas & Electric inspectors
have red-tagged about 840 furnaces since the original warning
was issued, said Ed Van Herik, a utility spokesman. When it
received the CPSC's letter, the utility sent a follow-up letter
to 740 of these residents saying it would reinspect their
furnace, he said.
"Originally any [Consolidated]
furnaces we found we just tagged," Van Herik said. "Now we
just tag those with the 'X.' "
Even if they determine they have
a Consolidated furnace, homeowners are having a tough time
getting insurers to pay for a replacement. Most have had to
pay at least $2,000 to have a new furnace installed. Some
have had contractors refuse to come to their home if they
think they have a Consolidated unit.
Meanwhile, Zamiski said he's
been hired by two dozen builders in the state to inspect furnaces
in their communities. Southern California's fourth-largest
builder, Shea Homes, said it sent about 9,000 notices to residents
in its suburbs and received 600 or so replies. It plans to
send out 5,000 additional notices, said Max Johnson, vice
president and general counsel at J.F. Shea Co.
The CPSC is still in talks with
companies that distributed Consolidated furnaces to try to
get them to fund a recall, Radar said.
The agency said it didn't issue
a warning earlier about the furnaces because it was trying
to negotiate a recall with Indiana-based Consolidated Industries.
But it was unable to do so when the company filed for Chapter
7 bankruptcy and liquidated its assets last summer.
Copyright 2000 Los Angeles Times.
|