Faulty
Furnaces Cause More Fires
Some people choose
to keep them running anyway. The Gas Co. shuts down all it comes
across.
March 15, 2001/The
Orange County Register
By: TERI SFORZA
The fire-prone furnaces that homeowners were warned about
have caused at least five blazes since January in Southern
California - and may have sparked four more, officials said.
"These furnaces still pose a
very real and present life and safety hazard," said Mike Freige,
senior fire inspector in Torrance, who has led the charge
to educate people about the danger.
"They're igniting wooden attics
or admitting deadly carbon monoxide, which is colorless and
odorless. People often don't know they've been affected until
it's too late."
Still, many homeowners are loathe
to spend $2,000 or so to replace the furnaces. Some choose
to run them and take their chances, while others get creative.
"One family rigged up the clothes
dryer so the hose goes into the house and heats the place,"
said Paul Hunter, spokesman for the Orange County Fire Authority.
Since New Year's Day, there have
been at least five furnace fires in the region:
On Jan. 7, a furnace blaze destroyed
the attic of a Plaza del Amo condominium in Torrance. Damage:
$35,000.
On Jan. 16, a Lomita family was
sleeping when their attic caught fire. Damage: $8,000.
On Jan. 18, smoke poured from
a home in a Rolling Hills Estates home in Los Angeles. Significant
smoke damage.
On Feb. 7, a Glendale homeowner
raised his thermostat to 72 degrees; fire followed. Damage:
$25,000.
On Feb. 8, at 3 a.m., a Downey
family awoke to the stench of smoke. Damage: $15,000.
Freige is confirming that four
more fires - in Whittier, Camarillo, Pismo Beach and Rancho
Cucamonga - were also caused by the furnaces.
These furnaces - altered to meet
California air-quality standards - have steel rods installed
above the burners to reduce nitrogen oxide emissions. But
the "nox rods" heat up, crack the furnace casing and let flames
escape, posing a substantial fire risk.
In September, the U.S. Consumer
Product Safety Commission issued a warning about the furnaces,
which bear myriad brand names but were all made by one manufacturer:
Consolidated Industries (formerly Premier). They were installed
in about 190,000 homes between 1983 and 1994. Dozens of fires
have been linked to the furnaces, but no injuries or deaths.
No furnace-linked fires have
been reported in Orange County yet this year, but the furnaces
are everywhere. More than 184,000 homes, condominiums and
apartments were built here during the 12 years the furnaces
were on the market.
In the wake of the warning, The
Gas Co. has shut off 2,900 suspect ; 1,300 of them were in
Orange County.
One belonged to Melissa Oglevee
of Irvine, and she was not happy about it. "It's insane,"
she said.
Oglevee had called The Gas Co.
to have her furnace serviced. When a worker saw she had one
of the suspect models, it was "red-tagged" and turned off.
That was wrong, she said: Her furnace was just 40,000 BTUs
(a measure of the heater's power), while the warning applied
to furnaces over 60,000 BTUs.
"I told them that's the same
as if there was a recall of the Taurus, and they refused to
service an Explorer," Oglevee said. "They agreed, but wouldn't
turn it back on."
She had a copy of a letter from
the CPSC to The Gas Co. - saying that The Gas Co. may be shutting
down furnaces unnecessarily - but it didn't seem to matter.
"We're taking the safety high
road," said Denise King, Gas Co. spokeswoman. "The CPSC does
say that the safety alert is for furnaces rated 60,000 or
higher, but there's no clear data concerning the smaller ones.
They aren't saying there isn't a problem with the smaller
ones; they're saying they haven't tested them. Better to err
on the side of safety."
Studies on the smaller furnaces
are under way. But the CPSC letter says that even furnaces
on the suspect list can be used in the short term, so long
as they're thoroughly inspected, there's no evidence of failure
and safety improvements are made.
Since Oglevee couldn't persuade
The Gas Co. to turn her furnace back on, she hired a heating
contractor. He inspected the unit, declared it safe and turned
it back on. That cost her $55.
Similar restarts have occurred
in the Tustin complex that Robert Marrujo lives in - except
with the bigger units targeted by the warning. That makes
Marrujo nervous.
"A lot of people don't understand
the gravity of the situation," said Marrujo, who lives in
a complex of 35 town houses called Sevilla Homes, built by
Fieldstone. "They're concerned with, 'Who's going to pay for
my furnace?' I'm concerned about that, too - but I'm more
concerned about fire and making sure people don't use them."
Marrujo has taken it upon himself
to mail warnings to his neighbors and invite them to an informational
meeting with four heating contractors. Replacement costs ranged
from about $1,650 to $1,925.
Who'll get stuck paying? In Sevilla,
and throughout Southern California, many homes are freshly
past their 10-year warranty period. One of Fieldstone's homebuilding
competitors, Shapell Industries, is covering the cost of replacing
defective furnaces, even on homes that are out of warranty.
But 396 Investment Co., Fieldstone's parent, has decided homeowners
whose warranties have expired are on their own. The company
is surveying homes still under warranty and will replace damaged
furnaces.
Marrujo doesn't think that's
fair, since problems with the heaters surfaced as early as
1994, when the homes were still under warranty. "It would
be nice if they could at least split the cost with us, or
use their buying power to get us a good deal, or something,"
Marrujo said. "This is a very serious problem."
Indeed, said fire inspector Freige.
He fears that, as the weather warms, people will shut off
their furnaces and forget about the problems until next fall.
"Then the cold weather will be here again and they'll be lulled
into a false sense of security, thinking 'It was OK last year,
maybe we can get another year out of it.'
"That's dangerous," he said.
|